UMAW Streaming Resources

Section 1:

The Problem with Spotify & Major Streaming Services

When streaming audio entered the US market in 2011, pioneered by Swedish company Spotify and then copied by Apple Music, Amazon Music and others, it avoided existing regulations previously passed by Congress for direct payment to recording musicians from existing digital networks. Currently, Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music and other “interactive” streaming platforms pay $0 directly to recording musicians, unlike prior forms of digital distribution such as satellite radio, internet broadcast, and even “non-interactive” streaming platforms like Pandora, all of which pay recording artists directly via non-profitSoundExchange.

As UMAW began publicizing in 2020 with ourJustice at Spotify campaign, streaming services pay royalties for recordings only to master rights holders – that is, record labels – and those royalties are outrageously low even as the platforms and major labels have made billions from this new system of distribution. Spotify controls the major share of the market and as a result has received the most scrutiny, but the same basic problems apply to all commercial streaming platforms.

Some facts about Spotify and streaming in general:

  • Spotify’s pay per stream to record labels currently averages $0.0035 [see Liz Pelly, Mood Machine, Chapter 13]

  • Even if an artist owns their masters, does not work with a record label or manager, is solo and owes no other musicians any share of their recording income, and therefore receives 100% of the per stream $0.0035 paid by Spotify for use of their recordings, it would take 714,286 monthly streams on Spotify to earn $15/hour living minimum wage. (In practice, musicians typically do not work entirely alone and generally share master rights with others, making even this calculation unrealistically high.)

  • Streaming currently represents 84% of all recorded music income in the US,according to the RIAA. There are hardly any income streams left for recordings outside of streaming.

  • In 2024, Spotify unilaterally decided to no longer account for any royalties to tracks that receive less than 1,000 streams per year.According to Luminate, this means that in 2025, 88% of all tracks on Spotify were demonetized and received no master rights payments.

These problems with streaming have created a crisis for working artists, who have been shut out from the benefits of this new technology even as they supply all its crucial content.

  • Rate per stream is declining while Spotify's revenue grows. Update current per-stream rate is  $0.0035

  • ARPU continues to fall — streaming devalues music as a commodity. In 2024 it was $5.08

  • Algorithmic curation and Discovery Mode as modern payola — artists pay for visibility with lower royalties.

  • Spotify's legal battles against the CRB to reduce songwriter mechanical royalty rates.

  • The Living Wage calculation: at $15/hr, how many monthly Spotify streams does one band member need? 714,286 

Section 2:

Digital Music Alternatives

Disclaimer: The platforms and projects listed here are some alternatives to Spotify and other major streaming services. UMAW does not endorse any digital music providers, and has not verified all of the business practices of the companies and projects listed here. If you’d like to add another alternative digital music resource, please email admin@weareumaw.org

Digital Music Alternatives

Ampwall - E-commerce platform. Free to use, but asks for a $10/year contribution to cover operating costs.

Bandcamp - E-commerce platform for independent music. Artists and labels receive 80–85% of sales after payment processing fees. Does not pay for streams — revenue comes from direct purchases. 10–15% revenue share on digital items, 10% on physical goods. Daily payouts.

Mirlo - Artist storefront with a cooperative model. Artists choose how to price their music and how much of each sale goes to Mirlo. Default platform fee is 10%, but artists can adjust this down to 0%.

Campfire - 501(c)(3) nonprofit building a public-benefit streaming platform to reform artist compensation and support local music discovery. User-centric subscription model. 20% for operations with no profit incentive; the rest goes to rights holders. Only artist rights-holders or independent labels accepted — no major labels or publishers.SubvertCooperative digital download marketplace 

Catalytic Sound - Music-based cooperative designed to create economic sustainability for its artists through patron support. 50% of listener spending goes directly to musicians.

Qobuz - Hi-res streaming platform. $11/month for users. Pays approximately $0.01873 per stream — significantly higher than Spotify. Commercial company.

SoundCloud - Audio distribution and sharing platform with user-centric payouts on Premier, Repost, and Repost Select tiers. VC-backed commercial platform. Fan-powered royalties model is an improvement but company structure remains conventional.-

Coda Music - Streaming platform claiming to pay 10x more than Spotify. 

Local and Public Streaming Services 

Below are publicly funded and library-backed platforms that provide free or low-cost access to curated local music collections. Most operate through MUSICat / Rabble. If you don’t see your city here, contact your local library and encourage them to create one!

Appleton, WI - FlipSide 

Austin, TX - Electric Lady Bird

Baton Rouge, LA - Red Stick Rhythms

Chapel Hill, NC - Tracks Music Library

Davenport, IA - QC Beats

Eau Claire, WI - Sawdust City Sounds

Edmonton, AB - Capital City Records 

Fort Worth, TX - Amplify817

Grand Rapids, MI - Vibes

Hartford, CT - The Beat

Huntsville, AL - Blast

Lawrence, KS - Kaw Valley Jukebox

Memphis, TN - Memphis Sound Connection 

Minneapolis, MN - MNSpin

Nashville, TX - Boombox

Pittsburgh, PA - STACKS

Portland, OR - Multnomah County Library Music Project

New Orleans, LA - Crescent City Sounds

Salt Lake City, UT - Hear Utah Music

San Francisco, CA - Bay Beats

Seattle, WA - Playback

Shreveport, LA - Logjam

Spokane, WA - Lilac City Records

Traverse City, MI - Waves

Tucson, AZ - Desert Streams

Section 3:

Academic Articles, Further Readings & Bookshelf

Combined from the existing "Readings on the Streaming Economy" and "Bookshelf" sections into one unified resource.

Articles & Reports

Academic essays:

Books

  • Mood Machine - Liz Pelly

  • Streaming Music, Streaming Capital - Eric Drott

  • Spotify Teardown — Eriksson, Fleischer, Johansson, Snickars & Vonderau (MIT Press)

  • The People's Platform — Astra Taylor (Macmillan)

Section 4:

Call to Action

Primary: Join UMAW & Support the LWFMA

The primary call to action directs visitors to join UMAW and take action in support of the Living Wage for Musicians Act (LWFMA). This is the most impactful action a visitor can take.

Suggested CTA: "Join UMAW and fight for a living wage for musicians."

Secondary: Switch to Alternatives & Organize Locally

Encourage visitors to pursue alternative streaming platforms and get involved with mission-aligned music organizing efforts in their city.

Suggested CTA: "Switch your streaming. Support your local music community. Get organized."

Editorial Note: Consider linking to local UMAW chapters or a directory of mission-aligned music organizing groups. Could also link back up to Section 2 for specific platform recommendations.